Covering & manufacturing · rubber and polyurethane · Quebec450 664-4000·1 800 361-5588·EN|FR
Études de cas · Acier & métaux en feuilles

Steel sheet wringing: lowering the hardness to fix the flat spots

Case study · plant now operated by ArcelorMittal · Soremag

Wringer rollers that flat-spotted within a few weeks, insufficient wringing and downgraded coils. The reflex would have been to harden the cover so it would resist better. We did the opposite — and that is what fixed the problem.

The context

A rolling mill now operated by ArcelorMittal, on a processing line for steel sheet in coils (coils): up to 5 ft. wide, 1,000 ft. long, several tons per coil. The steel is cleaned there in a water-based solution with a high caustic content, then goes through a wringing section before the rest of the process.

This section holds up to 13 pairs of wringer rollers — one on top, one underneath — over several tens of meters. Each roller measures about 6 ft. wide by 15 in. in diameter and can weigh up to a ton. Their job is simple to state and hard to pull off: get the sheet out as dry as possible. When the solution is not completely removed, caustic streaks are left on the steel — the finished product loses value, and a poorly wrung coil can be rejected outright.

The problem

The rollers barely lasted a few weeks before they had to be resurfaced or refurbished. Worse: they were not wringing properly, which caused material losses on top of a high maintenance cost.

On inspection, the wear did not look like distributed abrasion. The cover showed flats (flat spots): localized flattened areas, while the rest of the circumference kept its diameter.

Our analysis

A flat spot never tells a story of wear: it tells a story ofstanding still. To mark the cover at one precise spot, the roller has to stay stopped while the product runs past.

That is exactly what was happening. These rollers are not mechanically driven: no motor, no chain. It is the steel sheet, pulled by the recoiler, that has to turn them by friction alone. But with a cover at 80 Shore A, the sheet slipped for several meters before it managed to drive the rollers. Through all that slipping, the steel rubbed on motionless rubber — and left a flat spot with every coil that went through.

So the problem was neither the quality of the rubber nor the way the roller was built: it was a problem of traction. This way of tracing a wear mark back to its cause is at the heart of our Roller and wheel diagnosis.

Pourquoi la dureté change tout ici

A softer cover flattens more under the nip pressure: the contact area with the sheet widens, and with it the friction available to drive the roller right from the start. The same conformity produces a second, subtler effect: instead of a nearly point contact that lets a film of solution slip past, the cover follows the sheet along a continuous wringing line — the solution is pushed out instead of being bridged over. A harder roller does neither one.

The solution

We proposed lowering the hardness from 80 to 60 Shore A — but not only that. A rubber that was simply softened would not have stood up to the caustic solution. So we reformulated the nitrile : a recipe adjusted to keep the chemical resistance to the alkaline environment while getting the mechanical behavior wanted in the nip. It is this double adjustment — hardness and formulation — that made the solution work. This material-and-hardness reasoning is the one behind our Material Selection Guide, applied to our rubber rollers.

At a glance

Client
Laminoir aujourd'hui exploité par ArcelorMittal — ligne d'essorage de feuille d'acier
Année
2003 · référence client : service du laminoir
Application
Rouleaux essoreurs, jusqu'à 13 paires · acier traité en solution caustique
Dimensions
≈ 6 pi de large × 15 po de diamètre · jusqu'à 1 tonne par rouleau
Avant
Nitrile vulcanisé, 80 Shore A — plats, essorage insuffisant
Après
Nitrile reformulé, 60 Shore A — entraînement quasi instantané
Durée de vie
De ≈ 3-4 semaines à ≈ 3-4 mois

Putting it to the test

The rollers were built at 60 Shore A with the new formulation, then production was restarted. The results were conclusive on both counts: the drive of the rollers became almost instant as soon as the sheet is pulled, and the wringing turned out to be clearly better than what the line had been getting before.

The benefits

3-4 wks → 3-4 months
Cover life, about 4 times longer
No more flats
The rollers turn from the start of the rewind: the slipping is gone
Product upgraded
Better wringing let the steel be sold at a higher price

The flat spots disappeared, since the rollers are driven as soon as the coil starts moving. Much more effective wringing reduced material losses — and the steel obtained was even upgraded, and therefore sold at a higher price. Finally, the frequency of maintenance work dropped sharply: beyond the direct savings, it made it possible to put the mechanics on other tasks instead of the recurring replacement of the same rollers.

What this case shows

The lesson is counter-intuitive: when a roller gets damaged fast, the reflex is to harden it so it will “resist better”. Here, hardening it would have made the problem worse. If an undriven roller develops flat spots, look at traction first, not at wear resistance. The same reasoning applies to any line with idler rollers driven by the product itself.

This case is also a reminder that hardness is not a quality grade but a design parameter: 60 Shore A is not “worse” than 80, it is simply the number that suited this function. Our article on Shore hardness explains what the durometer measures — and what it does not.

Comportement dans le nipRevêtement 80 Shore ARevêtement 60 Shore A reformulé
Surface de contactÉtroite, peu de conformitéÉlargie, le revêtement épouse la feuille
Entraînement par la feuilleAprès plusieurs mètres de glissementQuasi instantané
Mode de dégradationPlats localisés à chaque bobineUsure répartie, normale
EssorageFilm de solution qui échappe au contactLigne d'essorage continue

A note on yesterday's equipment

This line had been designed at a time when steel sheet was thicker, recoilers were slower and the quality requirements on the finished product were lower. In that context, an 80 Shore A cover was a perfectly justified choice.

It is the conditions that changed, not the roller. That is often where the most profitable gains are hiding: a piece of yesterday's industrial equipment can be adapted to today's needs without being replaced — provided the original specifications are re-examined instead of being carried over out of habit.

Rollers that flat-spot, uneven wringing or a service life that is costing you too much?

Talk to our team

Frequently asked questions

Pourquoi baisser la dureté d'un rouleau plutôt que la monter quand il s'use vite ?+
Because the wear we saw was not abrasion, but flat spots caused by slipping. The usual reflex — harden it so it resists better — would have made the problem worse: the harder the cover, the less it flattens in the nip, and the less grip it has to be driven by the sheet. Going from 80 to 60 Shore A widens the contact area, the roller starts with the sheet and the slipping disappears. The right question is never “which hardness resists the most”, but “what is damaging the part”.
Comment reconnaître un plat (flat spot) d'une usure normale ?+
Normal wear is spread over the whole circumference and loses diameter uniformly. A flat spot is localized: the roller keeps its diameter everywhere except over one portion, often with a polished or glazed surface. A flat spot reveals a roller standing still while the product runs past — so a drive or braking problem, not a material problem. Our Roller and wheel diagnosis reviews these wear signatures.
Un rouleau plus souple s'use-t-il plus vite ?+
Not necessarily — here the opposite happened: service life went from about 3-4 weeks to 3-4 months. A softer cover can be more sensitive to certain wear modes, but if the real cause of the degradation was slipping, removing it extends the life of the part well beyond what hardness alone would suggest. The formulation counts too: here the nitrile was reformulated, not just softened.
Quel composé de caoutchouc résiste à une solution caustique ?+
The choice depends on the concentration, the temperature and the exposure time. On this line, a reformulated nitrile was chosen because it had to stand up to the alkaline solution while giving the mechanical behavior wanted in the nip. The selection is always made on the whole picture: chemical in contact, temperature, nip pressure and drive method — that is the approach of the Material Selection Guide.
Que faire des rouleaux existants — les remplacer ou les recouvrir ?+
In the great majority of cases the steel core is reusable: we strip the old cover, prepare the surface, cover it with the new material and then grind to the required tolerance. That is the very principle of roller covering : changing the working surface without rebuilding the whole part.

A similar case in your plant?

Describe the roller that is giving you trouble: we analyze the wear and propose the right material, the right hardness and the right formulation for your line.

Contact Us

Going further: wringer, wash and squeegee rollers — void volume, rewetting and the choice of polyol against hydrolysis. And on the drive mechanics at issue here: pull rollers.